Reported by Ted Koval, PMP in OmahaAccording
to an Associated Press article, written by
Michael Tarm, high-speed
rail plans in California and the Midwestern USA appear to be front
runners in the race for $8 billion in stimulus cash, based on federal
government criteria released on 17 June 2009 that favor projects with
established revenue sources and multi-state cooperation.
Eight
Midwest states have cooperated closely to promote a network, with
Chicago as its hub, that would join 12 metropolitan areas within 400
miles.
Karen Rae, deputy administrator of the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), stopped short of naming favorites during an
interview with The Associated Press in Chicago, but she praised
Midwestern states for their cooperation and pointed to California's
bond issue.
"California
by having the bond has a step up," said Rae, who added that many
factors would determine final distribution of the stimulus money. The
FRA's 68 pages of rules also seek projects that would reduce regional
highway and airport congestion and create jobs, especially among lower
income Americans.
Mehdi Morshed, executive director of the
California High-Speed Rail Authority, was upbeat about the federal
guidelines, saying he did not believe anything in them might undermine
his state's bid. "If you expect to get billions of dollars from the
federal government, they are reasonable criteria," he said.
Missouri
Governor
Jay Nixon, a supporter of the Midwest network, said he was
encouraged by the latest release, in part because of the emphasis on
regional cooperation. "Clearly we were benefited by the criteria that
were laid out today," Nixon said. "We are not the caboose on this
train."
US states will have to move fast to get a share of the
funds, with the FRA guidelines setting a July 10 deadline for
pre-applications and an Aug. 24 deadline for most final application
documents. The FRA intends to release the first round of grants by
mid-September.
Any
region can present a long-range plan, but the FRA has highlighted 10
major corridors that cover lines in Texas, California, Florida, the
Pacific Northwest, the Midwest, the Gulf Coast, the Southeast, northern
New England, Pennsylvania and New York.
The latest guidelines
call for detailed cost-benefit analyses to be submitted with
applications, but
Randal O'Toole, of the free-market oriented Cato
Institute in Washington, D.C., said deadlines coming so quickly one
after another will make it impossible to scrutinize the submissions.
"It's hard for me to imagine federal authorities are going to take
these analyses seriously. said O'Toole, a longtime critic of
government-backed programs. "There's no time for that."
President
Barack Obama laid out plans in April for high-speed rail he said would
help dramatically change the way Americans travel. Even advocates
concede the $8 billion isn't nearly enough for a wholesale change in
passenger-train service, something that would require hundreds of
billions more. But backers hope the stimulus money, as well as $1
billion a year for five years proposed for high-speed rail in the 2010
federal budget, will lead to more funding in the future.
The
Midwest project foresees upgrades of three existing routes: Chicago-St.
Louis; Chicago-Madison, Wisconsin, via Milwaukee; and Chicago-Pontiac,
Michigan, through Detroit. Later, they would upgrade a St. Louis-Kansas
City, Missouri route. The governors of the eight Midwest states -
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio and
Wisconsin - wrote Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood in April
appealing for money for the region, one of the hardest hit by the
recession.
To View Michael Tarm's Article in its entirety, please see:http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i0OD7AJj2mfsgxLnuvfyMrUSj75AD98SONI00Photo Sources: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/passengerrail/onepagers/midwest.htmlhttp://www.dot.state.mn.us/passengerrail/highspeed.html