Editorial | Viewpoints | Papers | Case Studies |Student Papers | Community |Scene | Publications
The
full text of student papers are available as PDF files. Click on the full
text link in the summary to access the full content in PDF format.
by Jérémy Abonneau
Key Performance Indicators help an organization to define and measure progress toward organizational goals. Once an organization has analyzed its mission, identified all its stakeholders, and defined its goals, it needs a way to measure progress toward those goals. Key Performance Indicators are those measurements. Applied to project management, Cost Performance Index (CPI) pretends to be an indication of how efficiently the project manager is using its resources. CPI is an output of Earned Value Management System (EVMS).
The term “Earned Value” is gaining in popularity around project management circles as if it is some wonderful new concept to be embraced. Yet, it has been in use since the 1960s when the Department of Defense adopted it as a standard method of measuring project performance. The concept was actually developed as early as the 1800s when it became desirable to measure performance on the factory floor. Today, it is both embraced and shunned, often in response to prior experience or stories told “in the hallway.” The opponents will generally cite the cost and effort to make it work, and the limited benefit derived from its implementation. The proponents will cite the cost savings to the project overall, the improved analysis, communication and control derived from its implementation. No doubt, the two camps have vastly different experiences to formulate their perceptions.
In this paper, we will look at Earned Value and the different ways to calculate it. Then will review the attributes of a KPI and try to apply them to the CPI, highlighting the possible cause of mistakes in its utilization.
Read the full text at Can CPI Be a Suitable KPI? Let’s Go Deeper on EV and AC Calculation
by Claudia Lorena Lopez Valencia
How to finance a project and how to get advantage of the market in order to succeed is one of the most important topics in project management. The project manager and project’s financiers must be aware of the finance and management issues such as Build-Own-Operate, Build-Own-Transfer, Build-Own-Operate-Transfer etc.
In managing a project, there must be a structure consistent with project financing practice. When deciding where to look for finance, how much is needed and how the money should be obtained, the project manager is dealing with project finance and the challenge here is to lead the project to a happy ending within budget and specifications. Looking at the resources and defining what to do with them is only the beginning of a large and delicate process of knowing how to present your case and how to get the money to achieve a deal that is beneficial to both the company and the financier.
In this article we will analyze the different methods of financing projects in public and private sectors and how lenders and borrowers take advantage of the situation to achieve mutual earnings.
Read the full text at Financing Methods in Project Management and Its Relevance in the Success of a Project
by Carole Lehel
Over the past five years, with the new economy, there has been a shift toward increased technology usage and many insurance companies have embraced technology to support their business. They have seen the opportunity to use Internet as a new channel of distribution for their products, complementing their traditional sales channels (agents or brokers) and as a way to build a competitive advantage.
Over the last year insurers have spent between 2.5% and 3% of premium on IT. Celent believes that over the next five years, this will increase to between 3% and 3.5% as IT becomes increasingly more essential to insurance company operations and consumes a larger portion of operating ratios. As overall premium grows modestly over the next five years, IT spending will correspondingly keep pace.
As the main objective for companies is to continuously improve overall productivity by reducing the costs and increasing revenues, the need for comprehensive IT management has become more apparent. Increased competition and the growing need to demonstrate return on investment have dictated a new approach to managing IT. It is no longer about keeping the system running; it is about accountability and improved decision-making.
Read the full text at Using the Total Cost Management Tools and Technique in IT Insurance Projects
by Ramakrishna Reddy
Research on software cost estimation started independently in a number of companies and military organizations that built large software systems. Formal research into software cost estimation became necessary when software applications and systems software began to go beyond 100,000-source code statements in size. The main issue that led to formal research programs for software cost estimation was the difficulty encountered in completing large software applications on time and within budget. A secondary issue was the fact that when deployed, software applications often contained significant numbers of bugs or defects.
The software cost estimation industry and the project management tool industry originated as separate businesses. Project management tools began appearing around the 1960s, about 10 years before software cost estimation tools. Although the two were originally separate businesses, they are now starting to join together technically.
Project management tools have no built-in expertise regarding software, as do software cost estimation tools.
Read the full text at Cost Estimating in the Software Company