PM Practices March - April 2005

Competency-Based Project Manager Certification

Ron Waller, PMP, PMI Fellow, CEM
Chair PMCert™

Project driven organizations need competent project managers to reach their objectives. A valid project manager competency-based certification program can provide the answers to questions about project managers. The process is:

Except for the asapm™ competency-based credential, there is no other project manager certification supported by a member driven professional organization in the USA. There are other credential issuing organizations, but they are affiliations of commercial for-profit or academic enterprises and are not globally recognized. Also, such credentials do not require the candidate to provide performance evidence of having actually managed a real project. And, while there are many PMI® PMPs® who have or are currently managing projects (including myself), this is not a project manager credential and no project manager experience is required to qualify.
The first step in a credentialing program is to determine what is desired to certify and why. Credentialing always means differentiating. An appropriate project manager certification model should have an adequate number of roles to differentiate among the practitioners that have active project leadership responsibility. The asapm role model (based on the globally recognized IPMA ICB) is:

Competencies are usually defined as clusters of related knowledge, attitudes, skills, capabilities, and other personal characteristics held by an individual affecting a major part of their professional work. Several models dominate the competency assessment process

Competency-based assessment is the evaluation of a candidate’s competence against a set of established standards. Since leadership and vision cannot be assessed with the same reliability as planning and scheduling, “indicators,” which can convey an inference of various competencies, are usually used. Relying on a single assessment approach reduces precision and decreases reliability. An integrated approach to competency assessment combines standards and approaches in a holistic set. Each of the above models has strengths and weaknesses; the asapm model uses all three.

Competency assessment requires that the evidence, provided by the candidate, infer a competency level to the appropriate standard. The candidate submits a self-prepared project report, peer references, and other supporting evidence. “Experience,” i.e. just having spent time in a particular environment or role, is not and does not support a competency by itself. The candidate must also document performance.

American Society for the Advancement of Project Management

PMCert, the credentialing organization for asapm

For questions about the program or project manager credentialing please email - ron@asapm.org

About the Author:

Ron Waller currently provides project management services as Principal Consultant of Sigma Projects Group, Eagle River, Wisconsin, a company he founded in 1999. Sigma Projects Group provides services to government and industry. Previously, he was employed by Johnson Controls, Inc, (JCI) Milwaukee, WI, in various positions including Director - Government Systems Operations, Director – Project Management Center of Excellence, and Regional Operations Manager.

Ron was a member of the PMI Midwest (now Chicagoland) Chapter Board for more than eight years and the International Board of PMI for 6 years, serving as President in 1996 and Chair in 1997. He received the PMI Board of Directors "Distinguished Contribution to Project Management" award (1990), the PMI "Presidents Citation" (1991) and was elected “Fellow of the Institute” (1999).


SEI Taxonomy Based Risk Identification

The Software Engineering Institute (SEI) recommends a taxonomy based risk identification which may provide a useful starting point for project managers working in software development. SEI describes it as “a method for facilitating the systematic and repeatable identification of risks associated with the development of a software-dependent project. This method, derived from published literature and previous experience in developing software, was tested in active government-funded defense and civilian software development projects for both its usefulness and for improving the method itself. Results of the field tests encouraged the claim that the described method is useful, usable, and efficient. The report concludes with some macro-level lessons learned from the field tests and a brief overview of future work in establishing risk management on a firm footing in software development projects.” (http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/93.reports/pdf/tr06.93.pdf)

David Curling, former editor of PM World Today writes: “… it is a great check list for those in the software development business. I know that I would have given my right arm for such a list when I was involved in the management of major IT systems in the Canadian Federal Government.”

Back to Practices

Back to PMWT Practices Index

Top of Page