Editorial | Viewpoints | Papers | Case Studies | Community | Scene | Publications
For the past year or so, David Curling, Paul Giammalvo, Robert Youker; R.
Max Wideman; Yves Mboda; Teguh Utomo PMP; Ridwan Wibiksana PMP; Serge de
Bock, PMP; Yani Suratman; Robinson Akiri; William R. Duncan; Faye Lumsden;
Peter Heffron and a group of other practitioners directly or indirectly involved
with INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT MANAGEMENT, have been working to create
an "Open Source" (public domain) Project Management
Methodology or Manual of Practice and accompanying Glossary of Terms.
The initial "project" (to
get this launched) was intentionally created to have no formal affiliation
with any single professional organization, and the contributed works are
subject to "Copyleft" or GNU License Agreement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License,
which means what you find on the site and/or contribute is FREE for you or
anyone else to use, with minimum restrictions. (As opposed to "Copyright",
which is very restrictive)
To fulfill this dream, David Curling, Paul Giammalvo, Rainer Volz and several
other key players felt the best approach would be to use a "Wiki",
which is a very powerful and flexible open source collaborative software
designed to enable workgroups to develop Glossaries http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Main_Page and documents normally viewed as books. http://www.wikipedia.org/.
Unfortunately, the recent untimely passing of David (who was sponsoring and
hosting the original site) left the core team with no alternative other than
to duplicate several months of work in getting a new site set up. Thankfully,
Yani Suratman, President Director of PT Mitratata Citragraha www.getpmcertified.com volunteered to fund the open source hosting and licensing of the Wiki for
the next two years, and we are pleased to announce that we are officially
BACK in business- www.IDPMGUIDE.INFO Under the current configuration, we
are using Splitbrain’s “dokuwiki” open source software
as the engine, http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:dokuwiki and Wikipedia as
the model or templates for both the Glossary and Manual of Practice or Methodology.
The names introduced at the beginning of this message represent the original "founders",
and now that we are starting to get rolling, we are inviting the readers
of the PMForum to our "Soft Launch" to “test drive” what
we have created and to Kick Off this Program. (We call it a program based
on the fact that what we created has no defined end...... It is a perpetual "living
document", subject to continual change, editing and updating)
As the Wiki software is collaborative, ANYONE can contribute. There is nothing
you have to do other than click on www.IDPMGUIDE.INFO,
fool around in the playground for 15 minutes or so until you get comfortable
with how the Wiki works, and then contribute what you feel you can. No fees,
no signing of copyright agreements, no need to even provide your name if
you don’t
want to. (Although if you want to claim your PDU’s it would be wise
for you to identify what it is you contribute)
While you are free to start anyplace you feel you can make a contribution,
our recommendation would be to start by populating the GLOSSARY with project
management terms AS THEY ARE USED AND UNDERSTOOD in the International Development
Project Management Community, keeping in mind that we CANNOT violate other
copyrights. (In other words, we cannot simply take definitions from the PMBOK
Guide, Max Wideman's Glossary or other copyrighted sources) However, we CAN
CITE those sources as references in crafting the definitions
we believe appropriate for use by the International Development Project Management
Community. (See http://www.library.ualberta.ca/guides/citation/index.cfm )
Other ways you can contribute would be to look at the Table of Contents of
the proposed International Development Project Manual and add, modify or
delete that to reflect your views, understanding that whatever you contribute
is subject ONLY to peer review and acceptance. No single person or group
of people have "veto" power over any contribution. Everyone who
contributes has an equal voice in what is or is not adopted.....
For those artistically inclined, we need a logo and for you software guru's,
we need to add navigation buttons and other bells and whistles to make the
site more user friendly...... In particular, we need a polling feature set
up so we can vote on issues where no clear consensus exists.
And for those of you who are PMP's, CCE’s or hold other credentials
requiring recertification, be sure to log your time spent on this effort,
as it certainly will qualify for PDU's.......... (especially for those of
you working on remote sites!!)
Will it work? Who knows....... But judging by the success of Wikipedia,
we believe it certainly has a lot of potential......
In closing, you are on the ground floor of something very new, something
very interesting and something potentially very important and valuable
to the International Development Community. Please take the time to contribute
SOMETHING, and let's see where this all goes. I would also like to dedicate
this effort to the memory of our good friend, professional colleague and
all around great guy- David Curling, PMP, PMI Fellow. May his soul rest
in peace.......
Paul D. Giammalvo, CDT, PMP, CCE, MScPM, PhD Candidate
Senior Technical Advisor, PT Mitratata Citragraha, Jakarta, INDONESIA
Adjunct Professor, Project/Program Management, ESC-Lille, Paris, FRANCE
Letters to the Editor are readers comments and observations on the Editorial, Viewpoint Columns, articles, papers or other notices of PM happenings appearing in the monthly issues of the Project Management World Today.
Editorial Policy: The PMFORUM® has no connection to any national or international project management organization nor does it reflect the policy of any project management professional or commercial organization. The PMFORUM® maintains an objective and impartial view of project management affairs. In the interests of advancing professional project management the PMFORUM® will publish contending and objective views on issues that reflect collegial differences and perspectives