Editorial | Viewpoints | Papers | Community |Scene | Publications
By Robert Youker revised February 2006
The thesis of this article is that there is overwhelming evidence that the PMI and other certification systems and project management bodies of knowledge do not measure the most important factors for success in managing projects. To prove this point I will summarize research by Professor Owen Gadeken of Defense Systems Management College at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, Professor John Kotter of the Harvard Business School and a recent book by Justin Menkes.
Owen Gadeken has conducted more than five research studies over the last dozen years to identify what are the most important competencies for a project manager to have success. All of the studies utilized the critical incident method of research and follow-up surveys where outstanding PMs are interviewed to identify what they do that makes them so effective. (for details on the approach and results see: Gadeken , Owen, What the Defense Systems Management College Has Learned From Ten Years of Project Leadership Research, Proceedings of PMI Research Conference 2000 p 274 – 256) The research resulted in defining the following eight behaviors of the best project managers:
Note: Italicized competencies differentiate top performers.”
I think it is obvious that the PMI certification test cannot measure a prospective PM’s competency in these 8 categories. It is also clear that the PMI PMBOK ® only covers perhaps half of these factors but without the necessary emphasis for a PM to know where he/she should concentrate their effort.
Dr. Gadeken summerizes his studies as follows: “However, an emerging view of the project management profession is that while technical and managerial expertise are important, the primary role of project managers is to provide the leadership focus on their projects.” Owen concludes that this implies, “This includes carefully structuring processes for selection, assessment and development of project managers …” The required behavioral skills in gaining influence and getting groups to commit to objectives are difficult to assess and innovative approaches are required.
Professor John P. Kotter of the Harvard Business School published an article entitled, What effective general managers really do, in the November-December 1982 Harvard Business Review. This was a follow-up to similar research by others including Henry Mintzberg in his book and article, The Nature of Managerial Work, Harper & Row(1973). The conclusion of all of this research was to quote Kotter: "A rather large gap exists between the conventional wisdom on management functions, tools and systems on the one hand and actual managerial behavior on the other. The former is usually discussed in terms of planning, controlling, staffing, organizing, and directing -". Does this sound like the PMI PMBOK®? The study focused on a group of successful general managers and consisted of interviews, questionnaires and observations. These various studies all found that actual managerial behavior did not consist of Planning etc.but was much less programmed. Project managers are in effect mini-general managers so the results of Kotter's and the others research are relevant for Project Managers also. In fact the project manager track is an excellent way for organizations to develop future general managers who gain a view of many different functions of a business in contrast to someone who has grown up in just one function.
Kotter found effective GMs concentrated their effort on three behaviors as follows:
Kotter defines the dilemma facing a new general manager in terms that sound exactly like the challenges facing a new PM.
Effective general managers develop agendas for what they want to accomplish consisting of “loosely connected goals and plans that address their long, medium and short term responsibilities”. They do this with informal discussions with a very wide range of people, especially by asking questions.
Kotter also found that effective executives, “allocate significant time and effort when they first take their jobs to developing a network of cooperative relationships among those people they feel are needed to satisfy their emerging agendas – including outsiders”. Does this not sound like a Project Managers job? Does the PMI certification process measure this? “They try to create the appropriate “environment” (norms and values) they feel is necessary to implement their agenda”.
Then comes execution. “After they have developed their networks and agendas, effective GMs tend to shift their attention toward using the networks to implement their agendas. They marshal their interpersonal skills, budgetary resources, and information to influence people and events in a variety of direct and indirect ways.” Does this again not seem to describe the PMs job? Does the PMI PMBOK® discuss this in a way that a potential project manager could learn how to actually perform these behaviors in a real situation? “Excellent performers ask, encourage, cajole, praise, reward, demand, manipulate, and generally motivate others with great skill in face-to-face situations.” Are these behaviors measured in the PMI certification process?
Kotter draws several conclusions that are relevant to the project management situation today.
Justin Menkes has recently written a new book, "Executive
Intelligence" that maintains that the key factor for executive success
is "superior
reasoning and problem solving skills that enable the executive to cut thru
the fog of conflicting data and create a solution tailored to suit each
situation at hand." He lists 17 critical skills that best managers use
to
think their way through problems. He says the best way to find people with
these skills is an oral group examination with hypothetical business problems.
Do
the questions on the PMP® examination measure this?
For a conclusion I will quote from an article by Kate Belzer, Project Management: Still More Art than Science, CNIDR Isearch. “Today’s project manager must be able to apply the processes, tools, and techniques of the trade efficiently and effectively to be successful. However, without mastering the timeless soft skills to supplement the hard skills, few project managers will succeed.”
I think it is clear that behavioral skills are most important and that they
can not be learned by reading a guide nor be measured by a simple certification
process based on a multiple choice test. Instead sophisticated methods of
assessment, selection and coaching are required to insure that potential
project managers have the requisite behavioral skills including problem solving
and emotional intelligence.
Editorial Policy: The PMFORUM® has no connection to any national or international project management organization nor does it reflect the policy of any project management professional or commercial organization. The PMFORUM® maintains an objective and impartial view of project management affairs. In the interests of advancing professional project management the PMFORUM® will publish contending and objective views on issues that reflect collegial differences and perspectives